By Ending a Harsh Conservative Welfare Policy, This Budget Definitively Outlines How the Labour Party Will Wage the Struggle to Revitalize Britain
Just recently, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party budget. The public have been calling for Labour’s purpose and values to be more clearly expressed. Through the decisions made – a transition to a more equitable tax system, focusing on wealth to pay for addressing child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have clearly set out what we stand for.
That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began right away.
The Central Political Divide in British Politics
The central division in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who want to change it so it benefits ordinary working people, and on the other, our opponents, who support the status quo and the unsuccessful ideology of the past. We must now confront, and win, the argument.
The Tories had 14 years to fix things and instead, by any measure, they got far more dire. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, cutting off investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and neglecting to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.
Legacy of Decline Under the Former Administration
Quality of life dropped by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages remained flat, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people scarred by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The record of failure continues.
One budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our strategy will reap dividends.
Social Security and Child Poverty
During the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the effects instead of the solution.
It’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we pursue clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap
This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For eight long years, since it was enacted, poorer families with children have suffered from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.
It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.
Real Impact in Local Areas
From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents this Christmas depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to redirect time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty.
Lasting Effects of Child Poverty
Just a quarter of pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among affluent families. This sets them up for the disadvantages they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.
Addressing child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the £3bn cost of lifting the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.
That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so acting early in the parliament was vital.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is abolished.
Equitable Funding for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be explicit that these initiatives are being funded in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Final Thoughts
Fairness and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I repeatedly said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must seize back the political platform and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve certainly done that this week.
So let’s maintain it and prevail in this struggle about how we will renew Britain and tackle the entrenched inequalities impeding progress.