🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."