🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.